MLA Style
<Sample footnoted essay (Word document)
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
MLA Style
Sample footnoted essay (Word document)
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Thinking about Thoreau
1. In a speech from the early 1940s, the poet Ezra Pound dismissed Thoreau’s project in less than twenty-five words. Pound viewed it as Thoreau’s “First intellectual reaction to mere approach of industrialization: Thoreau tried to see how little he need bother about other humanity.” Would you agree with Pound that the experiment Thoreau takes up at Walden Pond demonstrates his indifference to other humans? Why or why not?
2. Does Thoreau show socialist tendencies, though he is writing before socialism is a recognized idea?
3. Thoreau makes it very clear at the opening of Walden that his stay in the wilderness was not a lifestyle choice but rather a temporary experiment, and that “At present I am a sojourner in civilized life again.” Does the short duration of Thoreau’s stay at Walden undercut the importance of his project?
4. How is Walden an expression of the transcendentalist vision?
5. Is the claim that the narrator of Walden is an anti-social recluse a valid one?
6. Describe how the narrator’s financial “economy” is expanded to a philosophy of life.
7. What makes Walden a unified work of art rather than a “collection of eighteen essays”?
8. Discuss the seasonal metaphor that thematically unifies Walden.
9. Consider the significance of Walden Pond as a symbol.
10. Discuss the narrator’s attitude toward the state.
11. Describe the narrator’s reaction to the railroad.
12. As described in Walden, what is wrong with American culture?
13. Discuss the significance of the narrator’s bean-field.
14. Discuss the significance of Thoreau’s use of the “I” voice in Walden.
15. Thoreau occasionally forces a long series of tedious details upon us, as for example when in “House-Warming” he tells us a precise history of the freezing of Walden Pond over the past several years. Similarly detailed passages refer to his farming endeavors, his home construction, and other topics. Why does Thoreau repeatedly display these irrelevant details? How do they fit in to his overall plan for Walden?
16. Thoreau has inspired twentieth-century leaders such as Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi, but it is not certain that he had any leadership potential himself, though he often posed as a kind of prophet for his fellowman. Is Thoreau a leader? Why or why not?
17. At times Thoreau seems like a diarist narrating the flow of everyday events, as humdrum as they may be. At other times he is almost a mystic writer, as when he compares the topography of ponds to the shape of the human soul. And at still other times he is a social critic and moral prophet. Does the hodgepodge of genres in Walden contribute something positive to its overall meaning for us?
18. Thoreau is a practical man and a close observer of nature, but he is also a fantasist who makes a lot of references to mythology. In Economy he mentions the Greek myth of Deucalion and Pyrrha who created men by throwing stones over their shoulders. He compares his weeding to the epic battles at Troy. What is the effect of all these mythological references? Do they change the overall message of the work in any important way?
19. Thoreau repeatedly praises the simplicity and industriousness of the working poor, and comes very close to joining their ranks when he lives at subsistence level in the woods for two years. Yet in his chapter on reading he disdains popular tastes in books, implying that everyone should be able to read the Greek tragedian Aeschylus in the original, as he does. His allusions to world literature are quite lofty, including Chinese philosophers and Persian poets. Is Thoreau a snob? If so, is his democratic populism undermined by his disdain for popular culture?
20. What would Thoreau make of the fact that Walden is one of the most commonly assigned texts in high school and college literature courses across the country? Would he welcome the fact that he has become part of the mainstream culture that he was criticizing?
Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
What did Thoreau have to do with the 60s
I had first encountered Thoreau during an earlier political era, reading Walden in the early sixties. As the political turmoil of the decade erupted, so did my adolescence. Thoreau’s message of steadfast individuality appealed to my fourteen-year-old mind. When I read him again as a freshman in college, the sixties had provided a rich personal and cultural mulch. The Civil Rights movement had reached its zenith; feminism simmered; environmentalism renewed its call; Vietnam War protests surged. An array of personal emancipations (sex, drugs, rock and roll) and social demographics (baby boomers entering adolescence) combined to create a climate where his ideas could flourish. Civil disobedience was the most obvious Thoreauvian lesson, but more profound, his celebration of individuality inspired a generation of American students. Some took this credo as a license for their own hedonism; others understood individuality to entail moral responsibility for one’s personal and political life.
[4] But how was Thoreau holding up in the nineties? Had Walden retained its power to transfix and transform the young? And what about me? Did the elixirs that had intoxicated me as a teenager now taste of snake oil?
[5] My students were intrigued by a personality so at odds with convention, a writer who could go from musings on a diving loon to the cost of building a house in a matter of sentences. An erudite laborer, a mystical pencil-maker, a poetic surveyor Thoreau both fascinated and baffled them. He described himself variously ח cultural historian, political commentator, Transcendentalist, teacher, nature writer but all subordinated to his self-image as prophet, awakening his fellow citizens from the slumber of complacency. To what end, though? By what means? And how did nature fit within this agenda?
from Thoreau as a mirror
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
resources
Transcendental strip tease oral lecture (real player)
Thoreau reader with good set of responses to Thoreau
Thoreau as a mirror of ourselves
Is Thoreau selfish?
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
Expectations for writing
These are the “fatal” mistakes. Papers with these errors will not receive a grade:
1. Misspelled words
2. Sentences that begin without capitals
3. “I” not capitalized
4. Use of text-messaging abbreviations, such as “u” for “you”
5. Sentence fragments
6. Run-on sentences (with “comma splices")
Papers with these errors cannot receive a grade higher than “C”:
1. Subject-verb agreement errors
2. Pronoun-antecedent agreement errors
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Grammar and Usage Guides •
Reading, thinking, writing
You can summarize a point that Thoreau is making, using a mixture of paraphrases and quotes. Here, the main point is that Walden is full of practical advice:
Walden contains a surprising amount of practical advice. To begin, Thoreau encourages parents to let their children hunt and fish, so that they can learn about nature in the most effortless and pleasant way possible. He urges clean housekeeping through descriptions of his own simple methods and, negatively, through the humorous picture of the slovenly Mrs. Field, “with the never absent mop in one hand, and yet no effects of it visible anywhere”. He indirectly suggested that Field himself mend his ways and work less so that he would need less food; in addition, Thoreau might not have minded if Field could have known his thoughts on chastity and hence brought into his boggy environment fewer cone-headed infants than the swarm which he obviously could not provide for.
Publication Information: Book Title: Barron’s Simplified Approach to Thoreau’s Walden. Contributors: Robert L. Gale - author. Publisher: Barron’s Educational Series. Place of Publication: Woodbury, NY. Publication Year: 1965. Page Number: I.
Here, the main idea is that Thoreau advocated simplifying our lives so we could pay attention to what is important in life:
To get the most from life, Thoreau advocated reducing our needs and consequently the time necessarily spent providing for them. In his passion for simplicity, he even campaigned for reversing the Biblical formula, that is, to have a six-day Sabbath and toilfully sweat only on the seventh day each week. Yet it should be added at once that, far from disliking work, Thoreau relished it when it was meaningful. He took his own sweet time when he built his house by the pond, because he wanted to savor each stage of the process: “I made no haste in my work, but rather made the most of it”. He took pride in any honorable work he agreed to perform, and advises us to do the same, “so . . . that you can wake up in the night and think of your work with satisfaction”. He also rejoiced in his ability to perform commendably at a great variety of occupations and as a result feared the inevitable advent of labor specialization. It should be added that Thoreau did not do his minimum of toil so that he could loll in the mild sunshine for hours and days on end, nor does he advise us to reduce our needs to this ignoble and slothful end. “Who knows what beautiful and winged life . . . may unexpectedly come forth?”. Only productive leisure can warm such a life into being. A less slothful retirement than Thoreau’s to Walden can hardly be imagined. His example there should be object-lesson enough for those who deplore the coming of automation as the dread creator of too much free time.
Publication Information: Book Title: Barron’s Simplified Approach to Thoreau’s Walden. Contributors: Robert L. Gale - author. Publisher: Barron’s Educational Series. Place of Publication: Woodbury, NY. Publication Year: 1965. Page Number: I.
You can focus on the writer’s use of language (form):
Thoreau’s sentences. . .are often unusually long. It takes very little search to find one half a page in length, and more than one runs on for a full page and more. But again so carefully constructed are they that the average reader has no difficulty with their syntax and is hardly aware of their complexity. Let me take just one serpentine example:
I sometimes dream of a larger and more populous house, standing in a golden age, of enduring materials, and without gingerbread work, which shall still consist of only one room, a vast, rude, substantial, primitive hall, without ceiling or plastering, with bare rafters and purlins supporting a sort of lower heaven over one’s head,—useful to keep off rain and snow, where the king and queen posts stand out to receive your homage, when you have done reverence to the prostrate Saturn of an older dynasty on stepping over the sill; a cavernous house, wherein you must reach up a torch upon a pole to see the roof; where some may live in the fireplace, some in the recess of a window, and some on settles, some at one end of the hall, some at another, and some aloft on rafters with the spiders, if they choose; a house which you have got into when you have opened the outside door, and the ceremony is over; where the weary traveler may wash, and eat, and converse, and sleep, without further journey; such a shelter as you would be glad to reach in a tempestuous night, containing all the essentials of a house, and nothing for housekeeping; where you can see all the treasures of the house at one view, and everything hangs upon its peg that a man should use; at once kitchen, pantry, parlor, chamber, storehouse, and garret; where you can see so necessary a thing as a barrel or a ladder, so convenient a thing as a cupboard, and hear the pot boil, and pay your respects to the fire that cooks your dinner, and the oven that bakes our bread, and the necessary furniture and utensils are the chief ornaments; where the washing is not put out, nor the fire, nor the mistress, and perhaps you are sometimes requested to move from off the trap-door, when the cook would descend into the cellar, and so learn whether the ground is solid or hollow beneath without stamping.
Three hundred and fifty-one words-and yet I doubt if any attentive student has any difficulty with its meaning. I do not, however, want to give the impression that all of Thoreau’s sentences are grammatical leviathans. There are sentences in Walden only five words in length. One extreme is as frequent as the other and the majority are of more moderate length. Thoreau understood fully the necessity of variety in sentence structure and length. The point is that he could handle the sentence well no matter what its length.
Publication Information: Book Title: Walden Revisited: A Centennial Tribute to Henry David Thoreau. Contributors: George F. Whicher - author. Publisher: Packard. Place of Publication: Chicago. Publication Year: 1945. Page Number: 3.
In the following paragraph, the writer gathered examples of the vivid sensory details Thoreau used to bring his descriptions to life:
The most important characteristic of Thoreau’s word choice is its vividness. Emerson once said of Thoreau, “In reading him, I find the same thought, the same spirit that is in me, but he takes a step beyond, and illustrates by excellent images that which I should have conveyed in a sleepy generality” ( Journal, IX, 522). Thoreau’s words are primarily sensory. He makes you hear, see, taste, feel, and smell what he is writing about. He is particularly noted for his brilliant description of the world of nature around him. Take for example this account of the pickerel caught in Walden Pond:
When I see them lying on the ice, or in the well which the fisherman cuts in the ice, making a little hole to admit the water, I am always surprised by their rare beauty, as if they were fabulous fishes, they are so foreign to the streets, even to the woods, foreign as Arabia to our Concord life. They possess a quite dazzling and transcendent beauty which separates them by a wide interval from the cadaverous cod and haddock whose fame is trumpeted in our streets. They are not green like the pines, nor gray like the stones, nor blue like the sky; but they have, to my eyes, if possible, yet rarer colors, like flowers and precious stones, as if they were the pearls, the animalized nuclei or crystals of the Walden water.
Note also his descriptions of people, for example that of Mrs. Field:
She too was brave to cook so many successive dinners in the recesses of that lofty stove; with round greasy face and bare breast, still thinking to improve her condition one day; with the never absent mop in one hand, and yet no effects of it visible anywhere.
Even the abstract he is able to express in concrete terms:
Time is but the stream I go a-fishing in. I drink at it; but while I drink I see the sandy bottom and detect how shallow it is. Its thin current slides away, but eternity remains. I would drink deeper; fish in the sky, whose bottom is pebbly with stars.
It has been said of Thoreau that he was the first American to write a modern prose. One need only place Walden alongside the work of his contemporaries to recognize how much most prose of a century ago has dated and yet how modern, how up-to-date is his style. There is little wonder that such authors as Ernest Hemingway, Sinclair Lewis, Willa Cather, Ellen Glasgow, E. B. White, Robert Frost, Marcel Proust, and even Henry Miller have paid their tributes to Thoreau’s style.
Publication Information: Book Title: Walden Revisited: A Centennial Tribute to Henry David Thoreau. Contributors: George F. Whicher - author. Publisher: Packard. Place of Publication: Chicago. Publication Year: 1945. Page Number: 3.
You can relate personal experiences and personal beliefs to the reading:
I remember clearly the day when I first picked up a copy of Walden at the age of 15. My friend told me that it was too difficult, but I was already exploring the woods, walking 2.5 miles each day to save a dime, and dreaming of living in a cabin some day, so Thoreau spoke directly to me. Although we have our differences both in degree and kind, I have never met another person as much like me as Thoreau. His insights were powerful in helping me improve my life, and Thoreau gave me permission to lead the life I wanted to live. My father, before he died, saw me as a failure, much as Emerson viewed Thoreau, but my father never saw the magical world that I have lived in, a world that is richer than anything money could ever buy. I always felt sorry for him. If you wish to live a boring and conventional life, devoting your days to working for someone else, your nights to watching TV, your weekends to cutting grass, and your cash to purchasing one consumer product after another, Thoreau is not for you. If you wish to experience life, then you will find that Thoreauvian insight can free up your time, energy, and possibilities.
You can draw on other things you have read and know to extend your reading of the text:
I think Mohandas Gandhi, more than any other political leader, followed the truths that Thoreau discovered (Gandhi was also strongly influenced by Leo Tolstoy and John Ruskin, whose views were similar to Thoreau’s). Gandhiji had his party adopt the spinning wheel as its emblem because he saw local initiative and self-sufficiency as the solution to the problems of India, and he continually educated people to reform their own lives. He practiced everything he advocated, personally cleaning up human wastes, for example. His battle for justice was that of an individual. He would publicly break an unjust law, such as the law against making salt, and then ask the judge to give him the most severe penalty possible, telling the judge that when he was free that he would immediately break that same law again. On one occasion, he asked every worker in India to stay home for one day. The British told their workers that anyone who did not come in to work would be fired. That day, not a single worker in India showed up to work! That little man in a dhoti could float the British Empire like a chip (see below). Unfortunately, Gandhi could not prevent his own party from abandoning his principles after his death.
You can draw conclusions, and form your ideas about what meaning the text has. The following writer expresses his belief about what it means to be a follower of Thoreau--a “Thoreauvian”:
First, I think a Thoreauvian is a person who is self-reliant, self-actualizing, and self-sufficient. As children, we were none of these things, and many people remain children all of their lives. Being self-reliant does not mean getting your own car and your own apartment; that just swaps you from one dependency to another; it means making your own decisions about who you are and what you want to do with your life. Being self-actualizing means that you don’t sit around waiting for someone (such as the US Army) to do something to you but that you actively seek your own direction and purpose. And being self-sufficient means that you learn how to do things for yourself. It’s impossible to learn how to do everything, and it would be foolish to try to do so, but it’s rewarding and economical to solve many of life’s problems on your own.
Second, a Thoreauvian does not live to acquire money, a big house, fine cars, expensive foods and wines, etc. because these things are not valuable. A Thoreauvian finds true wealth in personal experience, the beauty of Nature, the quest for knowledge, self-exploration and discovery, plain foods, and simple healthy transportation, such as walking, cycling, and skating.
Finally, I would expect a Thoreauvian to be tolerant towards people of other cultures, religions, beliefs, and behaviors because a Thoreauvian recognizes that there is more than one pathway to the truth. On the other hand, a Thoreauvian would not agree with the nonsensical notion that any way of thinking or doing is just as good as any another. (Each of these points in these three paragraphs can be supported by direct quotes from Thoreau.)
http://www.kenkifer.com/Thoreau/conclus.htm
You can ponder particular passages, relating them to yourself and people around you:
Thoreau rightly points out that most of us spend much of our time sleep-walking through life. We know hes right because when we hear the accusation we immediately know it is true. Luckily, this accusation also serves as a wake-up call:
The millions are awake enough for physical labor; but only one in a million is awake enough for effective intellectual exertion, only one in a hundred millions to a poetic or divine life. To be awake is to be alive. I have never yet met a man who was quite awake. How could I have looked him in the face?
What would it take to awaken us?
We must learn to reawaken and keep ourselves awake, not by mechanical aids, but by an infinite expectation of the dawn, which does not forsake us in our soundest sleep. I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestionable ability of man to elevate his life by a conscious endeavor.
We are all capable of elevating our life if we consciously try, but until we make that conscious effort we will continue to sleep walk through life.
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
Michael Evans
I often wonder how different my social life would be if I were to abolish instant messenger, e-mail and Facebook from my life.
Writer and naturalist Henry David Thoreau similarly wondered what his life would be like if he were to remove himself from society and live in a quaint, one room cabin in a wooded area by Walden Pond in Massachusetts. One of the only wooded areas still available in the heavily farmed area, Walden Pond was appealing to Thoreau, who was focused on seeking a spiritually fulfilling relationship with nature.
Thoreau was not a fan of the industrialization of the farming era and felt Walden Pond was an ideal getaway. He stayed in his cabin for two years, but was not a hermit or recluse, as many people think. He took long walks into town daily to interact with citizens. His experiment of displacing himself from city life, in his eyes, made him a more spiritual, creative and well-rounded human being.
It would be an enormous undertaking to mimic Thoreau’s experience in the present day, especially for college students. Not only would it be next to impossible to find an environment similar to Walden Pond, it would prove difficult to give up the luxuries of our pampered lives.
Just like Thoreau removed himself from the city and moved into the woods, consider what it would be like to remove yourself from the world of the Internet, and enter the “natural” non-cyber world we once had as small children. For just a week, or a day even, test yourself and see if you could eliminate your Internet usage (unless completely necessary for work or school).
Why would one ever want to do such a thing? What is so wrong with the Internet that we would take the time to engage in such an outlandish experiment? Yes, the Internet has improved the way we live in leaps and bounds. It has enhanced our communication skills through the integration of helpful tools such as the aforementioned instant messenger, Facebook and e-mail.
Although these tools have improved our communication, by granting easy instant access to our friends and family, it has also hindered our communication. We have become so comfortable with instant messaging and e-mailing people, that when we come face-to-face, we forget how to interact. Instead of calling someone for a more personal and intimate conversation, where intonation and sarcasm can be detected in our voices, we sit down in front of the computer and hold multiple “convos” at once.
These Internet conversations become disengaging and impersonal. We are so acclimated to this type of communication, we often do not see any harm in it. When my roommate instant messages me from his room while we are both home, it raises a red flag. Why couldn’t he have simply walked to my room and submit his inquiry in person? And how is it that timid people become magically uninhibited online?
If I were to turn the switch on my computer and become MIA from the cyber world for just a week, it would force others to at least call me on the phone to ask me how I’m doing. And maybe, just maybe, I would get a handwritten, tangible invitation to a party rather than a cyber invite via Facebook.
I am very happy to have these tools, but often use them more than I should. I feel it becomes a problem when others begin to rely on those tools as their only means of communication with their friends. My relationships would flourish if I opted to speak in person or through telephone instead of through instant message.
So, I am taking my own little Walden Pond experience for a bit and distancing myself from the Internet. Maybe it will broaden my mind a little, like it did to Thoreau.
Michael Evans is a senior in journalism and can be reached for comment at . He’ll get it when he’s done with his break from the Internet.
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
Responding to Walden
by John Kaufman
Americans like to make much of our political freedoms, our right to pursue happiness unburdened by government, to speak our minds and worship without fear. But when it comes to the use of machines, especially the ever-growing assortment of high-tech contraptions, even conservationists and the more liberal-hearted have bought into a form of ecological and economic tyranny.
It was Henry David Thoreau who first pointed out that we Americans were becoming “the tools of our tools.” But Thoreau could not foresee what we have now become: the victims of convenience. Today we are so dependent on fossil fuel and electric power (President Bush failed to mention our addiction to power plants) that even the briefest loss or scarcity of either disrupts our economy and sends us all into a cultural and personal tizzy.
Thoreau understood that political freedom was inadequate without an economic or technological liberty, so he famously set out to discover just how few tools a person needed to live well.
If we compare the contents of Thoreau’s cabin with those of a contemporary apartment or office, the difference is striking. Thoreau tells us that his “furniture” consisted of “a bed, a table, a desk, three chairs, a looking-glass, three inches in diameter, a pair of tongs and andirons, a kettle, a skillet and a frying pan, a dipper, a wash-bowl, two knives and forks, three plates, one cup, one spoon, a jug for oil, a jug for molasses and a japanned lamp.”
Heat was supplied by a fireplace. To cool off, Thoreau jumped into Walden Pond. I assume his writing was accomplished with pen and paper, though perhaps he made use of a newfangled writing tool: the pencil.
So armed with a desk, a chair, pencil and paper, and the luxury of an oil lamp, Thoreau produced one of the great classics of American literature. Furthermore, he wrote “Walden” without in any way polluting Walden Pond; he burned no fossil fuel, he was not hooked to or on a power plant. And because he lived simply, he had a lot of time to loaf, to walk, to write. Thoreau was, in every sense, a free man.
Thoreau was also, of course, a 19th century man unburdened by wife or children. And his literary genius allowed for little sympathy for those farmers and other laborers of Concord who needed or preferred to work longer hours and accumulate more possessions. Thoreau, nevertheless, is useful to us today because we are a nation that cannot say no.
Apart from the great expense and complexity of digital gadgets, we in the computerized world now suffer from what we might call electronic harassment. Though most obvious in our use of cell phones (aptly named, as in a virtual prison of communication), computers in general do more harm than good by promising what they cannot provide: a smaller, more intimate world, a more comfortable reality. A “chat room,” for instance, is in no way a conversation, for too much of the human relationship is obscured; the chatting becomes mere chatter that is ripe for lying and delusions of intimacy.
Similarly, e-mail and the Internet serve to divide us more than unite us, distract us more than satisfy us. The telephone at least provides us with a voice, even when the voice is selling us something. What are computers selling? The idea that people and nature are less valuable than man-made miracles.
In the spirit of Thoreau, I no longer write on a glowing screen. My tool of choice is a 1938 Royal typewriter, a machine that is simple to use and dark and dull enough to leave the writer unmolested.
Free at last from Bill Gates, virtual viruses and polluting power plants, I am a liberated writer.
John Kaufman lives in Wauwatosa.
Published: November 22, 2006
http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/column/index.php?ntid=108538&ntpid=0
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
Responding to Thoreau
by Neville Barry
Henry David Thoreau: For the past 150 years, this man’s writings and lifestyle choices have evoked spirited debates, stirred emotions, and driven the American psyche. He has also been the inspiration for conservation and preservation, encouraged the concept of simplicity, and stated that civil disobedience is needed to ensure true democracy.
As a high school English teacher, I had the glorious opportunity to spend two weeks at Walden Pond. While I was there, I was able to study his writings and journals, walk the same paths he took, and enjoy the company of others. I was also provided the opportunity to live quietly, ponder my surroundings, and reflect on why this man’s ideas have become so critical to today’s issues.
When I decided to take this journey to Concord, I assumed that I would read a few essays, have a couple of quick discussions, and then enjoy the beautiful scenery of Walden Pond. However, as we all know, life is not that simple; instead, I inadvertently began a spiritual transformation. This elusive and transparent evolution occurs even now, but was ignited by one word: “wildness.” The term wildness is abstractly defined by Thoreau as “life consists of wildness. The most alive is the wildest. Not yet subdued to man, its presence refreshes him.”
As I read the essay “Walking,” this word crept into my soul and continues to haunt my dreams. Through Thoreau’s description of wildness, I realized that today’s society has lost some of its ferity, and we have become more complacent. Our complacency cannot be blamed on technological advances and/or the concept of the American Dream. Instead, we have separated ourselves from the raw and dangerous beauty of nature, because we consider her an outcast and obstacle to our greed and desires. We have also become disconnected with our inner voice that allows our creativity to flourish.
The lack of nature’s role in our lives, and our inability to speak with passion, I believe is what Thoreau fears will eventually be the demise of an individual’s identity. With the nexus between nature and the inner voice broken, the individual also loses his/her innate wildness. Without “wildness, individuals are more susceptible to conformity and are less likely to pursue an issue that requires integrity and determination.
Thoreau realized the urgency to depict the power of wildness, because he witnessed how every day complacency compromised and endangered individuality. He also understood that unless wildness was nurtured then an individual could not achieve his/her greatest potential. However, his urgency has not been fully comprehended, and as a school teacher, I am now a witness to a warning that has gone unheeded.
As I continue with my pilgrimage, I maintain the delicate, yet complicated idea of wildness in my conscience. For it is this word that has liberated me from the clutches of society’s restraints and permitted me to speak freely.
Thus I conclude with “all good things are wild and free.”
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/11-06/11-23-06/02opinion.htm
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Romanticism •
Use paragraph form!
Entries that do not follow the following three guidelines will get no credit:
1. Write in paragraph form. Each paragraph should state an idea (topic sentence) and then expand on that idea (development).
2. Misspelled words are not acceptable. If you don’t know how to spell a word, look it up. If you are writing on a blog, spell check before publishing.
3. Run-on sentences and sentence fragments are unacceptable.
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Grammar and Usage Guides • Handouts • Handouts • Handouts •
Annenberg Media
http://www.learner.org/resources/series44.html#
What do journalists mean by “reporting”?
Reading specifics is always better than reading generalities.
What is the first secret of opinon writing?
The secret is passion.
Shapeliness.
Don’t tell people everything you know. You can’t work short without working hard.
Wanting to be liked is death to the critic.
Political correctness is the fasism of the 90s.
Editorials, reviews, humor
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Readings • Readings •
Literary Visions series - Annenberg Media
A way to communicate a moment in time, so we can consider it, too.
http://www.learner.org/resources/series41.html# 30 minutes
“You’ve got to give [your ideas and memories] some kind of form for the sake of your own survival.”
Respond in your journal or on your blog to the video on the art of the essay. Answer the following questions.
1. Who was the first important French essayist?
2. Who was the first important English essayist?
3. What three purposes of essays does the video discuss?
4. Though readers’ responses to an essay may vary, what should not be different?
5. What is the most interesting insight you gained from Willie Morris’ “A Love that Transcends Sadness”? Don’t just give a short answer. Write a bit about it. Develop your point of view.
(0) Comments • Permalink • Printer-Friendly • E-mail this page
Handouts •
Google Apps
Writers' Studio
PHS Online (Moodle)
OurSpace (Ning)
PHS Flickr
Photography Club (Google)
Photography Club (MySpace)
Find more photos like this on OurSpace
Today's Assignments
English 11:
Advanced English 11:
AP English 12:
Table of Contents
(all posts, sorted by category}
Category Menu
Most recent entries
- “A River Runs Through It” Student Resources
- Wind From an Enemy Sky Resources & Study Guide
- Poems for Class
- Puritan resources
- Snow Falling on Cedars
- Charles Dickens
- Films available
- Things Fall Apart
- Vocabulary: Red Badge of Courage
- Red Badge of Courage Resources
- F. Scott Fitzgerald
- Great Gatsby Resources for Advanced English 11
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
- Emerson resources
- Huckleberry Finn Resources
Archives
- Complete Archives
- May 2011
- March 2011
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006